CAGW Criticizes New Technology Mandate in Massachusetts | Citizens Against Government Waste

CAGW Criticizes New Technology Mandate in Massachusetts

Press Release

For Immediate ReleaseDaytime : Jessica Shoemaker (202) 467-5318
September 21, 2005After hours :  Tom Finnigan  (202) 253-3852

 

Policy Would Drive up Costs for Taxpayers 

(Washington, D.C.) – Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today criticized a plan in Massachusetts to force all state agencies to shift all their documents to an “open” format.  The Massachusetts Information Technology Division is proposing the Enterprise Information Technology Architecture technology policy, which would mandate that state agencies use only open formats for the storage of documents by January 1, 2007.

“It is bad procurement policy for any state to unilaterally lock itself into one set of technologies,” CAGW President Tom Schatz said.  “Agencies should be able to accept bids from any company that can provide the desired product or service.  Government earns the best value for taxpayer dollars through a competitive, transparent, and accountable bidding process.”

“By rushing to establish such an arbitrary preference, the Romney administration is undermining free market competition and doing so without any serious consideration of the cost to taxpayers,” Schatz added.

The policy of standardizing the OpenDocument format for state agencies will lock out the use of proprietary software products such as Word Perfect, Lotus Notes and Microsoft Office, which are widely used and accepted in the marketplace.  However, the switch could incur additional costs:  Converting more than one million current files to the a new format; teaching and training a new technical support staff to provide state workers with assistance on the new systems; and re-training the entire state’s workforce to use the new software.  Furthermore, private sector businesses and average citizens could face compatibility problems in exchanging documents with all of the state agencies. 

“The proposed shift in software will be paid for by the taxpayers, businesses, and regular citizens of Massachusetts,” Schatz continued. “This will limit choice and access to whatever proprietary technologies may emerge in the coming years and could adversely affect the day-to-day operations of Massachusetts state government.  Gov. Romney should take steps to keep the state from making the wrong decision about the future of its use of technology.”

In July, 2004 the Office of Management and Budget stated that the federal government should keep its options open and assess the total cost of ownership when determining the best software to use.  An objective look at the merits of software considers maintenance, functionality, performance, and security – factors not always considered in procurement decisions based solely on a licensing or development model.